Accuracy and sourcing
Technical claims should be supported by an appropriate source or clearly identified as editorial assessment. Content records retain source type, evidence state, applicability, assumptions, limitations and checked dates. The absence of evidence remains an unknown.
Review, updates and corrections
New or materially changed technical content is reviewed against its sources, context and safety boundaries. Dates identify publication or review activity where relevant. A material error should be corrected clearly, without silently changing the meaning of an earlier statement. A future public correction route depends on the approved contact method.
Independence and commercial separation
Editorial decisions are separate from commercial relationships. Conflicts of interest should be recorded and relevant commercial material clearly identified. Product or software coverage should describe the basis of the coverage and its limitations.
Testing and sponsorship
Hands-on testing is only claimed when it actually occurred and its scope is stated. Sponsored or paid content must be identified where users encounter it. No sponsored content or official partnership is currently authorised. The active RACE Software affiliate relationship is disclosed at the relevant points of encounter.
AI assistance
AI may assist with research organisation, drafting, coding, formatting or production. It must not create evidence. Technical claims still require appropriate sourcing and review. AI-generated or representative data must never be presented as measured real-world data. AI assistance does not justify invented credentials, experience or testing.
Tools and safety
Tools show their method and limitations. They do not turn incomplete context into certainty. Safety-critical material remains subject to manufacturer instructions, component documentation, physical inspection, event requirements and qualified help where appropriate.